Drawing for EXPERTLY BETTER.

USPTO serial 86905864

EXPERTLY BETTER.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5247206Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2017
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with EXPERTLY BETTER.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anita B. Polott

Anita B. Polott Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Ave., NWAttn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consultation and evaluation in the field of energy efficiency and optimizationACTIVEDec 31, 2015
037Installation, repair and maintenance of climate control systems and plumbing services; heating contractor services; electrical contracting services; air conditioning contractor services; maintenance and installation of indoor air quality and automatic temperature controls; installation of indoor air quality componentsACTIVEDec 31, 2015
042Monitoring of indoor air quality and automatic temperature controls; remote monitoring of the function and use of indoor air quality and automatic temperature controlsACTIVEFeb 9, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 10, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 18, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 13, 2017SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 21, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 3, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2016CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2016GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance