USPTO serial 86905918
SUPERIOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OEHRLEIN, STEFAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERIOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam K Sacharoff
ADAM K SACHAROFF MUCH SHELIST, PC191 N WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical seals that attach to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Technical consultation services in connection with the repair, installation and maintenance of mechanical seals that attach to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Technical consultation services in connection with customized manufacturing of mechanical seals that attach to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance; Custom manufacturing of mechanical seals that attach to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation services in connection with design and engineering of mechanical seals that attach to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance; Technical consultation services in connection with selecting mechanical seals based on their engineering and design so as to be suitable for their intended uses in attaching to industrial pumps to prevent leakage and improve pump performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Process Equipment Components, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPERIOR PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |