Drawing for I INTERVIEW

USPTO serial 86906051

I INTERVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I INTERVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software applications downloadable to mobile, digital and other handheld and electronic devices which allow users to interact virtually and have conversations with celebrities, other high-profile and well-known personalities, and other individuals, living or deceased, through their digital representationsACTIVE—
035Promoting the goods and services of celebrities and other high profile or well-known individuals, living or deceased, and their estates through print, audio, video, digital and on-line medium; career planning services and providing career information for students and young adults in the fields of film, television, theater, and social mediaACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing for interactive interviews by members of the public with pre-recorded and pre-programmed, three dimensional, holographic images of personalities and othersACTIVE—
045Interviewing individuals for purposes of preserving their personal histories by way of holographic, three dimensional recordings allowing for passive viewing or for interactive interviews by others with the hologramACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance