USPTO serial 86906603
CONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2019
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with CONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Reynolds
Robert Reynolds Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP2045 W. Grand AveSTE. B PMB 84396Chicago, IL 60612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for automating business processes and employing optical character recognition (OCR) software for expense reporting, expense management, itinerary management, meeting management, vendor payment management, purchasing management, sales force management, customer service, financial reporting, marketing, and preparing sales projections; Downloadable mobile applications employing optical character recognition (OCR) software for use in online personal and business process automation for sales, financial management, itinerary management, expense accounting, expense reporting and marketing; Downloadable mobile application employing optical character recognition (OCR) software for enabling data synchronization and enabling predictive analysis and communications about data including receipts relating to automation of personal and commercial business processes, namely, expense management including receipt management and itinerary management | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2018 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring business process automation software including optical character recognition (OCR), for use in automating business processes relating to employee spending, such as expense management, predictive analysis for expense management, itinerary management, meeting management, vendor payment management, payment processing, and predicting trends and future needs related to them; Software as a service (SAAS) services, employing optical character recognition (OCR), featuring business software for inventory management, order management, procurement management, invoice management, time and expense reporting, itinerary management, customer management, and purchasing management and monitoring; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software, including optical character recognition (OCR) software, for use in online business process automation for sales, financial management, accounting, expense reporting, marketing, and software for use in automation of personal and commercial business processes, namely, expense management including receipt management and expense reporting | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |