Drawing for UC COMMANDER

USPTO serial 86906991

UC COMMANDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UC COMMANDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grace Han Stanton

GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software, namely, computer software for processing real time information, computer software for real time monitoring of network events, computer software for monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over local area networks, computer software for monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over a global computer network; computer software for assessing the productivity and efficiency of electronic communication processes; downloadable software, namely, downloadable software for processing real time information, downloadable software for real time monitoring of network events, downloadable software for monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over local area networks, downloadable software for monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over a global computer network; downloadable software for assessing the productivity and efficiency of electronic communication processes; computer software, namely, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) software, web conferencing software, video conferencing software, audio conferencing software, desktop sharing software, file transfer software, data transfer software, electronic mail software, and messaging software; downloadable software, namely, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) software, web conferencing software, video conferencing software, audio conferencing software, desktop sharing software, file transfer software, data transfer software, electronic mail software, and messaging software; business management software for processing real time information, real time monitoring of network events, monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over local area networks, monitoring and managing multiple modes of communication over a global computer network, software for processing real time input with respect to key performance indicators, policies and rules; industry specific software for processing real time information; downloadable online electronic publications in the nature of user guides and content from blogs in the nature of articles in the field of computer software and business management software; computer peripherals; parts and accessories for all of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Apr 14, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance