USPTO serial 86908839
BRAND NO.1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2017
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BRAND NO.1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stroitel Poselok, RU
Stroitel Poselok, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bethany Gaal
Bethany Gaal Patent Hatchery, LLC7 CLIFTON CTPIKESVILLE, MD 21208-1432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blanched nuts; Candied nuts; Flavored nuts; Flavoured nuts; Prepared nuts; Processed edible seeds; Processed nuts; Processed pumpkin seeds; Processed sunflower seeds; Roasted nuts; Seasoned nuts; Shelled nuts; Snack mix consisting of processed seeds; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, and also including seeds; Sunflower seeds, prepared; Trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, and also including seeds | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |