Drawing for CONVENIENCE SHOULDN'T COST MORE.

USPTO serial 86908896

CONVENIENCE SHOULDN'T COST MORE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVENIENCE SHOULDN'T COST MORE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail convenience store services; retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasolineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 27, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 21, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 14, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance