Drawing for FIRST PENGUIN AWARD

USPTO serial 86909289

FIRST PENGUIN AWARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST PENGUIN AWARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDLACKENBACH SIEGEL BUILDINGSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Analysis and consultancy for marketing research; event planning and management for business promotion or saleACTIVE—
036Settlement of payment, namely, bill payment services provided through a website; capital investment servicesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, training and instruction services relating to arts, crafts, sports or general knowledge, namely, information technology, marketing technology and financial technology; arranging and organization of seminars; conducting of seminars in the field of information technology, marketing technology and financial technology; providing information by the Internet about events for educational and cultural purposes relating to information technology, marketing technology and financial technology; arranging award ceremonies and gala evenings for entertainment purposesACTIVE—
042Computer programming; creating and maintaining web sites; providing technical advice and support relating to performance and operation of computers that require high levels of personal knowledge, skill or experience of the operators to meet the required accuracy in operating themACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 6, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 3, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 3, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance