USPTO serial 86909594
STEALTHPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEALTHPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Technical support services, namely, installation and troubleshooting of computer hardware, computer networks and platforms all in the field of cyber security | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the use and operation of computer software, hardware, computer networks and platforms all in the field of cyber security | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and implementing cyber security and privacy requirements and protocols in information technology systems for others; Information technology consulting services; Maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others; Updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting, reporting, analyzing and eliminating cyber incidents, namely, malware, unauthorized software and network attacks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in identification, acquisition, storage, encryption, management, manipulation, analysis and reporting of security breach events of computer and computer network data, metadata, data files, and information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in secure cross-enterprise data collaboration, workflow auditing and reporting, data management and sharing, identity management, access control, and data backup and recovery in the field of cyber security; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of cyber security; Consulting services in the field of cyber security; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms used for monitoring industrial network security in the field of cyber security; Consulting services in the field of testing and assessing networked devices for cyber security vulnerabilities and risks; Computer consultation in the field of cyber security, namely, providing approvals that minimum security levels have been achieved in the field of cyber security vulnerability testing of networked devices; technical support services, namely, installation, administration, and troubleshooting of computer software in the field of cyber security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STEALTHPATH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by StealthPath LLC
- Other trademarks owned by StealthPath LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEALTHPATH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |