Drawing for NODUP

USPTO serial 86910610

NODUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NODUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software for data compression, data storage and identifying and eliminating redundancy in the dataACTIVE
042Cloud computing services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for data compression, data storage and identifying and eliminating redundancy in the dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 22, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 22, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jul 5, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 1, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 2, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 2, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
May 5, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 21, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance