Drawing for PRIDEMY

USPTO serial 86915370

PRIDEMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIDEMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oliver Seebald

OLIVER SEEBALD OLIVER LAW170 S GREEN VALLEY PKWY #300HENDERSON, NV 89012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, cowls and smoke ring scarves; Clothing, namely, neck warmers; Clothing, namely, wrap-arounds; Beachwear; Belts; Belts for clothing; Bottoms; Dusters; Eyeshades; Fashion hats; Gloves as clothing; Hoods; Infantwear; Jackets; Jerseys; Loungewear; Mufflers; Nightwear; Rainwear; Ski wear; Sleepwear; Surf wear; Swaddling clothes; Swim wear; Swimwear; Thong beachwear; Thong footwear; Ties; Tops; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance