USPTO serial 86915456
CITY FLOOR SUPPLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY FLOOR SUPPLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
King of Prussia, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Floor coatings; Floor paints; Floor topcoats; Wood stains; Instant cure coatings for floors; Polyurethane coatings for floors | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
| 003 | Abrasive paper; Floor finishing preparation; Floor wax; Coated abrasives and sandpaper in the form of belts, sheets, rolls and discs | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
| 007 | Abrasive belts for power-operated sanders; Abrasive disks for power-operated sanders; Floor buffers; Floor cleaning machines; Floor edgers; Floor polishing machines; Floor sanders; Floor scrubbing machines; Floor staining and floor polishing machines; Floor washing machines; Automatic floor scrubbers; Machines to seal in floor staining and floor polishing preparations; Pads for floor polishing machines | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
| 017 | Sound absorbing flooring underlayment | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
| 019 | Flooring underlayments; Wood moldings; Wood sports floors; Wood trim; Athletic flooring; Bamboo flooring; Cork tiles and tiles of cork-based conglomerates being building materials for floors, walls and ceilings; Engineered hardwood flooring; Hard wood flooring; Hard wood flooring; Hardwood flooring; Hardwood decking and flooring; Parquet flooring; Waterproofing membranes for roofing, floors and walls; Wood sports floors; Wooden flooring | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
| 027 | Cork for use as a floor or wall covering | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by City FS Holding, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named CITY FLOOR SUPPLY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |