Drawing for STYLE ME PRETTY

USPTO serial 86916319

STYLE ME PRETTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLE ME PRETTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Licursi

Christina M. Licursi Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Ring pillows; printed plastic signs featuring table numbers for use in weddings and special events; fabric cake toppers; plastic cake toppers; fabric cake decorations; plastic cake decorationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2019PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 6, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 6, 2019MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 1, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2018PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 30, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance