Drawing for JACK

USPTO serial 86916461

JACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Reitz

JULIE E. REITZ Honigman LLP39400 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 2, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 17, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Feb 23, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 3, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 1, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance