Drawing for DOMINION QUESTAR

USPTO serial 86916893

DOMINION QUESTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOMINION QUESTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Baril

MARY BARIL MCGUIREWOODS LLP800 EAST CANAL ST.RICHMOND, VA 23219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004natural gas for heating, cooling, and industrial useACTIVE—
037installing, repairing and maintaining equipment consuming natural gas and the piping systems for delivering gas thereto; and drilling of oil and gas wellsACTIVE—
038providing point-to-point communication services in the nature of interstate long distance voice and data transmission by microwaves, for use in the natural gas industryACTIVE—
039providing transportation for and storage of natural gasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 17, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 31, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance