USPTO serial 86918052
MAPPEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAPPEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Goltry
MICHAEL W. GOLTRY PARSONS & GOLTRY15615 NORTH 71ST STREET, SUITE 106SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voltage surge protectors; voltage surge protection, namely, electrical arc detection and suppressing device; lightning arresters; lightning protection equipment, namely, lightning conductors, lightning rods and charge dissipation terminals; circuit protective equipment, namely, lightning arresters, fuses, and cut-out switches; devices to protect electrical equipment from irregular power, namely, surge protectors and voltage surge protectors; electrical surge protectors; over voltage surge protectors; surge suppression equipment, namely, voltage surge protectors and voltage surge suppressors; transient arrester voltage regulators; electrical surge arresters, namely, transient voltage arresters; transient voltage surge suppressors; voltage overload and surge protectors; voltage surge protective devices, namely, electrostatic discharge protective device; grounding and bonding equipment, namely, electrolytic ground rods, ground enhancing backfill, grounding and bonding cables, bus bars, ground plates, jumper cables, ground and signal reference grids, copper clad and stainless steel ground rods, retractable bonding assemblies consisting primarily of electric conductive cable and clamp and component parts therefor, all sold as a unit; electrical grounding connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPPEC MATERIALES-PRODUCTOS POLIMÉRICOSY ELEMENTOS DE CONSTRUCCIÓN, S. A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPPEC MATERIALES-PRODUCTOS POLIMÉRICOSY ELEMENTOS DE CONSTRUCCIÓN, S. A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAPPEC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |