USPTO serial 86918933
QIROX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2017
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with QIROX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Grossman
Steven J. Grossman GROSSMAN, TUCKER, PERREAULT & PFLEGER, PLLC55 South Commercial StreetManchester, NH 03101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric welding machines; automatic electric welding machines, automatic gas welding machines, automatic laser welding machines; gas-operated welding apparatus; gas-operated welding machines; electric arc welding machines; gas shielded metal arc welding apparatus and machines; tungsten inert gas welding apparatus and machines; welding torches; laser welding apparatus and machines; laser hybrid welding apparatus and machines; welding systems comprised of laser welding machines, electric welding machines and gas welding machines; welding fixtures, namely, welding generators; cutting machines; gas-operated cutting torches; electric cutting torches; plasma cutting apparatus and machines; electrodes for welding apparatus and welding machines; industrial robots; industrial welding robots; conveyors; wire supplying and feeding devices for electric and arc welding apparatus and machines; mechanical workpiece positioners, electrical workpiece positioners, hydraulic workpiece positioners, pneumatic workpiece positioners, all positioners being parts of machines; electric robot positioners, hydraulic robot positioners, pneumatic electric robot positioners, all positioners being parts of machines; pneumatic controls for machines; hydraulic controls for machines | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2010 |
| 009 | Data processing equipment; computers; computer software for database management and for the control of automatic welding machines, welding current sources and industrial robots; current rectifiers; electric converters; electric inverters; welding transformers; welding rectifiers; electronic controllers for welding apparatus and welding machines; material testing instruments and machines, namely, electronic apparatus for testing strength, hardness and tensile characteristics of industrial materials; testing devices for weldseams; endoscopes, other than for medical use; ultrasonic diagnostic instruments, other than for medical use; tactile sensors; optical sensors; laser sensors for measuring distance; laser sensors for detection of welding seam geometry, not for medical use; electrical sensors for measuring distance, electrical sensors for detecting welding arc length, not for medical use; electric sensors; sensors for testing of weldseams; electronic controls for electric and plasma cutting apparatus; electronic controls for handling devices; electronic controls for robots; microprocessor control systems for operating welding devices comprised primarily of computer software; computer software and programs on data carriers for the control of automatic welding machines, welding current sources and industrial robots; welding cells, namely, welding safety cabins, welding safety booths and safety items in the nature of welding curtains and screens; electronic controls for machines | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL CLOOS SCHWEIBTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by CARL CLOOS SCHWEIBTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by CARL CLOOS SCHWEIBTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QIROX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |