USPTO serial 86920661
CD CYBERDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE RISO, LOKSYE GEORGIANA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CD CYBERDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Anne Matheson
Julia Anne Matheson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors for machines; Electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller; Electric motors for power tools; Electric motors for toys; Electric motors for use in cameras, namely, for use in positioning lenses in cameras; Electric motors, and their parts, not for land vehicles; Electric motors, not for land vehicles; Electric starter motors; Electricity generators that may also be used as electric motors for vehicles; Gear boxes other than for land vehicles; Gear motors not for land vehicles; Gears for machines; Gears, other than for land vehicles; Motor starters; Motors for airplanes; Motors for boats; Motors for medical machines and apparatus; Motors for model vehicles and/or slot cars; Motors other than for land vehicles; Motors, namely, alternating current motors not for land vehicles; Motors, namely, synchronous motors not for land vehicles; Motors, other than for land vehicles; Airplane motors; Alternating current servo motors; Anti-pollution devices for motors and engines; Asynchronous motors not for land vehicles; Boat motors; Brushes being parts of motors, generators and dynamos; Catalytic converters for motors and engines; Compressors as parts of machines, motors and engines; Drive system having two or more synchronous motors coupled through clutches to drive a common load; Drives for motors; Driving motors other than for land vehicles; Electric motors for machines; Electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller; Electric motors for power tools; Engines and motors for the generation of electricity; Engines and motors for the generation of electricity; Filters for motors and engines; Parts of wind turbine motors, namely, compact drive systems; Permanent magnet motors; Power transmissions and gearing for machines; Servo motors; Servo-drives for motors; Speed governors for machines, engines and motors; Starter motors; Starters for motors; Transmission gears for machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic controllers for producing control signals for electric actuators and motor shaft retention brakes; Electric actuators; Electric valve actuators; Electrical controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software development consulting in the field of computer software for use in controlling an electric motor, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller, alternating current servo motors, electronic controllers for producing control signals for electric actuators and motor shaft retention brakes; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for controlling an electric motor, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller, alternating current servo motors, electronic controllers for producing control signals for electric actuators and motor shaft retention brakes; Design and development of computer software for controlling an electric motor, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller, alternating current servo motors, electronic controllers for producing control signals for electric actuators and motor shaft retention brakes; Development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of productization of electronic components and electronic systems; Development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of testing of electronic components and electronic systems; Testing of computer software for controlling an electric motor, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller, airplane motors, alternating current servo motors, electronic controllers for producing control signals for electric actuators and motor shaft retention brakes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |