Drawing for CHAMPION MOTOR SPEEDWAY PONTIAC, MI

USPTO serial 86921373

CHAMPION MOTOR SPEEDWAY PONTIAC, MI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAMPION MOTOR SPEEDWAY PONTIAC, MI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anessa Owen Kramer

Anessa Owen Kramer Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key ringsACTIVE—
018UmbrellasACTIVE—
020Chairs; seat cushionsACTIVE—
021Housewares and glassware, namely, drinking glasses, mugs; rubber, plastic or foam insulating beverage holdersACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, sweatshirts, shirts, sport shirts, golf shirts, T-shirts, sweaters, jackets, caps, visorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 31, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 29, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance