Drawing for DATE DEBATES

USPTO serial 86921520

DATE DEBATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATE DEBATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Patty

HERBERT PATTY THE LAW OFFICE OF HERBERT T. PATTY1625 THE ALAMEDASUITE 508SAN JOSE, CA 95126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for enabling users to discuss dating and related topicsACTIVEJan 2, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 19, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 17, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance