Drawing for OPTIONSFLUX

USPTO serial 86921762

OPTIONSFLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIONSFLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan A. McGonigle

RYAN A. MCGONIGLE Hodgson Russ LLP605 Third Avenue, Suite 2300New York, NY 10158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for use in financial planning, online management of accounts with financial institutions, financial account alerts and tracking expenditures and budgets; computer software for use in personal financial management, budgeting and financial planning, online management of accounts with financial institutions, financial account alerts, and tracking expenditures and budgets; downloadable video recordings featuring personal finance budgeting, financial management, financial planning; computer software and hardware for use in financial management and collection of investment trading and financial news data, and for use in providing financial information in the field of investment securities and financial instruments by electronic meansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance