Drawing for TINKET

USPTO serial 86924476

TINKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TINKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 SOUTH 6TH STREETSUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software in the nature of providing information regarding service providers in the beauty, health and wellness industries to allow the scheduling and management of meetings and appointments and booking reservations with such service providersACTIVE—
035Providing information for others regarding service providers, namely, providing recommendations of service providers to consumers for commercial purposes and providing information to allow the scheduling and management of meetings and appointments; Advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 11, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 11, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance