Drawing for B40

USPTO serial 86925297

B40

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B40?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginie L. Parant

VIRGINIE L. PARANT ARTECH LAW3500 W. OLIVE AVENUE#300BURBANK, CA 91505

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable mobile applications featuring information about pregnancy health and wellness, including data about prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal care; educational materials downloadable from a website, namely, downloadable videos, informational articles, infographics, pamphlets, brochures, and audio clips featuring educational information in the fields of pregnancy health and wellness, including prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal careACTIVE—
041education services, namely, arranging and conducting conferences and organizing educational events in the fields of pregnancy health and wellness, including prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal care; providing a website featuring nondownloadable educational materials in the nature of nondownloadable videos, informational articles, infographics, pamphlets, brochures, and audio clips in the fields of pregnancy health and wellness, including prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance