Drawing for MORE GREEN FOR LESS GREEN

USPTO serial 86926920

MORE GREEN FOR LESS GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORE GREEN FOR LESS GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nyall Engfield

Nyall Engfield MU P.C.12702 VIA CORTINA SUITE 101DEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035(Based on Use in Commerce) Providing consumer information in the field of medical marijuana dispensary inventories and locations; providing links to web sites of others featuring consumer information on medical marijuana inventories and locations; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring coupons, rebates, price comparison information, product reviews, links to the websites of others, and discount information; Online cataloging of the goods of others, namely, compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; electronic web based catalog services featuring herbal products; online services, namely, inventory monitoring and management for herbal productsACTIVEFeb 19, 2016
039(Based on Intent to Use) Providing a web site and web site links to geographic information and map images in the field of medical marijuana dispensary businesses via interactive computer networksACTIVE—
044(Based on Intent to Use) Providing medical information in the field of medical marijuana, and regarding indications and effects of particular cannabis strainsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 20, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance