USPTO serial 86926989
AMAZON TAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMAZON TAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allisen Pawlenty-Altman
Allisen Pawlenty-Altman KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE STREETSUITE 2800 MAILSTOP IP DOCKETING - 22ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital audio players and recorders; media players and recorders; computer hardware and handheld digital electronic devices in the form of remote controllers for controlling the operations of televisions, entertainment systems, home theatre systems, and consumer electronic devices and displays, audio, video, and media players and recorders, video monitors, set top boxes, game players; computer hardware and handheld digital electronic devices in the form of remote controllers for controlling software applications and for searching, manipulating, controlling, storing, displaying, playing, and recording audio, video, and multimedia content, and games; computer software for use in connection with digital content subscription service and search platforms to allow users to request and receive digital media content; computer software for creating, authoring, distributing, downloading, transmitting, receiving, playing, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, displaying, storing and organizing audio and multimedia content; voice-enabled software applications for use in searching, manipulating, controlling, storing, displaying, playing, and recording audio, video, and multimedia content, games, software applications, software application marketplaces, and program listings and guides; computer software for accessing, browsing, and searching online databases, audio and multimedia content, games, and software applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via global communications networks; interactive broadcasting and webcasting services over the internet and telecommunications networks; providing online forums for transmission of messages among computer users and subscribers concerning music, books, movies, motion pictures, television programs, games, toys, sporting goods, electronics, multimedia presentations, videos and DVDs, and other household and consumer goods, product reviews and purchase information on the internet; communication services via portable electronic devices, portable media players, and portable digital devices, namely, streaming of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the internet; communication services via portable electronic devices, portable media players, and portable digital devices, namely, audio and video broadcasting by telecommunications networks, wireless communications networks, and the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amazon Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amazon Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named AMAZON TAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |