Drawing for BEECH-NUT COLDPURÉE

USPTO serial 86927163

BEECH-NUT COLDPURÉE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEECH-NUT COLDPURÉE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian L. Michaelis

BRIAN L. MICHAELIS SEYFARTH SHAW LLPTWO SEAPORT LANESUITE 300BOSTON, MA 02210-2028

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Food processingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2018CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 21, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance