Drawing for FILTERTRACE

USPTO serial 86928189

FILTERTRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILTERTRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tanya D'Souza

TANYA D'SOUZA KAGAN BINDER, PLLC221 MAIN STREET NORTHSUITE 200, MAPLE ISLAND BUILDINGSTILLWATER, MN 55082

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic device for use in monitoring the health and performance of air filters, and a computer software program that uses the foregoing data to manage and store data related to the health and performance of the air filterACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring and managing the health and performance of air filtersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 5, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance