USPTO serial 86928567
POKÉMON GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POKÉMON GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae
JERALD E. NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game programs and computer software programs for consumer video game apparatus, namely, video game consoles and hand-held video game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; Computer game programs for handheld game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; Downloadable and installable video game and social media networking programs for consumer video game apparatus; Downloadable and installable video game and social media networking programs for handheld game apparatus with liquid crystal displays; Downloadable and installable programs for playing video games and accessing social networks for computers; Electronic game programs for computers; Pre-recorded electronic circuits, optical discs, ROM cards, ROM cartridges, CD-ROMs and memory cards, all of the above featuring video game programs and social networking programs for cellular phones; Pre-recorded electronic storage media featuring programs for cellular phones; Parts and accessories for cellular phones, namely, cell phone cases, power supplies, headphones, earphones, microphones; Downloadable electronic publications, namely, instruction booklets featuring video games and social media applications; Downloadable maps featuring images of characters and scenes from a computer game; Batteries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named POKÉMON GO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ISER | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |