USPTO serial 86928766
OSAGE ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSAGE ENERGY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Tang
JOHN A TANG STRASBURGER & PRICE LLP909 FANNIN STREET SUITE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Electrical contractor services; installation of electrical poles and lines from the grid to oil and gas production and midstream infrastructure; maintenance of new and existing electrical systems installations; installation, maintenance, and upgrade of complete electrical systems incorporating transformers, electrical boxes, motors, and related electrical oil/gas field services equipment; installation, maintenance, and upgrade of electrical automation and telemetry/monitoring systems; construction planning for overhead electricity distribution system; construction of towers and poles used in connection with electricity distribution; construction services for new and existing pipe lines; maintenance and repair of overhead electricity distribution system; construction services in the nature of site preparation, namely, site clearing and site excavation; installation of lightning protection system | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design of overhead electrical distribution systems, and custom design of lightning protection system; preliminary design services for overhead electricity distribution system; design of towers and poles used in connection with electricity distribution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |