USPTO serial 86929021
OLYCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLYCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Taylor
CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR HOOPER HATHAWAY, P.C.126 SOUTH MAIN STREETANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephone services, transmission of voice, data, and documents via telecommunications networks, providing prepaid and postpaid minutes for use on cell phones abroad, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of cellular and satellite transmissions and broadband, copper, and optical or wireless networks; internet service provider services; cellular network services, namely, providing communications via fiber optic networks, cellular telephone communication services; satellite communications services; wireless, digital, and electronic transmission of audio, voice, video, data, and information via satellite and terrestrial networks; providing user access to data transmission and reception services, namely, providing user access to global computer networks; providing access to telecommunications infrastructures for others; telecommunication access services; wireless, digital, and electronic data transmission and data broadcasting, namely, transmission of data by satellite, wireless networks, mobile wireless networks, global computer networks, and broadband networks; electronic data interchange services, personal communications services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |