USPTO serial 86929124
N
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2019
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with N?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Netcracker Technology Corporation
Waltham, MA
Netcracker Technology Corporation
Waltham, MA
Netcracker Technology Corporation
Waltham, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
Norm J. Rich FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K STREET, N.W.SIXTH FLOORWASHINGTON, TX 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and hardware for use in customer end user account management, customer end user account spending, identifying customer product usage and trends, customer relationship management (CRM), managing customer partner and sales channel account details emphasizing business relationship data including sales trends and related metrics, product inventory management including inventory management of hardware, servers and other deployed telecommunication equipment; computer software and hardware for use in revenue management, conducting end user account billing including creating invoices and statements and for tracking usage, and billable and non-billable activities of the end user, conducting predictive analytics ratings of the end user accounts, charging end users for account usage, telecommunication device management including managing routers, servers and other telecommunication devices and computer hardware, service fulfillment and assurance by assigning and tracking customer service technicians to support the customer end user service requests, resource management in the nature of tracking network bandwidths and network equipment availability and reassigning network operations from certain equipment to other available customer equipment; computer hardware for use in network management including for use with network servers, routers and other storage units, and for use in customer end user policy and management enforcement in the nature of tracking specific end user account actions, and enterprise application management; computer software and computer hardware for use in managing customer account data and for use in billing customers for the usage of computer network services; computer software and computer hardware for use in recording, managing and activating orders for customer use of computer network services, and for use in the operation, management and configuration of computer networks and computer networks used in enterprise workforce management; computer software and computer hardware for use in customer resource asset management, namely, for use in managing network capacity and bandwidth; knowledge management computer software and computer hardware for use in gathering, organizing, analyzing, and sharing business information among employees; computer software and computer hardware for use in performing enterprise financial analytics | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2016 |
| 035 | Business operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks for others; providing business data analysis services, namely, enterprise-based business analytics; business management services, namely, business management of enterprise workforces and business assets within a business; business knowledge management services within businesses; providing cost analyses, namely, enterprise financial costs analytics | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2016 |
| 037 | Telecommunications maintenance services, namely, the maintenance of telecommunication systems apparatuses, telecommunications networking hardware, apparatuses and instruments, and related telecommunications computer hardware systems for others; Implementation of telecommunications and computer networks, namely, installation of computer networking hardware for telecommunications systems | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2016 |
| 042 | Design and development of telecommunications and computer networks; implementation of telecommunications and computer networks, namely, installation of operating software for use in telecommunications and computer networks; computer services in the nature of end-to-end turnkey delivery, namely, the integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; service delivery platform services in the nature of managed services and end-to-end outsourcing, namely, developing and hosting software applications for others for use on mobile and internet-connected devices; managed services and end-to-end outsourcing service delivery platform services for delivering software applications for others, namely, providing temporary use of online nondownloadable software applications for others, all for use in operating telecommunication networks including tracking end user account usage and the use of customer computer hardware through the customer network, all provided for use via mobile and internet-connected devices; computer services, namely, providing online nondownloadable software for use in recording, managing and activating orders for computer network services; operation, management and configuration of computer networks; computer software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer relationship management | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Netcracker Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Netcracker Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Netcracker Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named N
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |