USPTO serial 86929612
EMASTERED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5088659Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2016
- Examiner
- NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMASTERED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valley Village, CA
Valley Village, CA
Austin, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sausser
Brent D. Sausser Sausser Summers, PC1022 Travers Dr.CHARLESTON, SC 29412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for providing better quality musical recordings; Providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to improve the quality of audio; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to upload and improve the quality of their music | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |