USPTO serial 86929981
IRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kang Lim
3494 CAMINO TASSAJARA, #444DANVILLE, CA 94506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | A cognitive computing platform featuring data analytics and machine learning tools for acquiring, processing, sorting and analyzing information to connect patient experiences with physicians and provide deep insights; data is acquired and processed from medical documents in many forms, namely, electronic (EHR), scanned, PDF, HTML, image and other flat files, integrated in a scalable pipeline, analyzed through adaptive and learning-based analytics; next-generation machine learning techniques allow a data set to learn from the analysis of past situations in order to better analyze future situations, namely, data teaches itself to produce more accurate results; using workflow or cloud-based SaaS applications, the insights produced by the cognitive computing platform are presented in a way that physicians, back-office staff, payers and other health care providers can easily understand and use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |