Drawing for LINELINK

USPTO serial 86930364

LINELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JEANIE H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda Rosen

12920 SE 38TH ST.BELLEVUE, WA 98006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing audio chat services; providing video chat services; transmission of electronic mail services; text messaging services and electronic messaging services, namely, multimedia messaging services; electronic voice messaging services, namely, recording and subsequent transmission of audio messages and transmitting textual transcriptions of audio messages; streaming services, namely, transmission of audio, video, text and multimedia content; providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; telephone communication services, namely, ringback tone servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 25, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 16, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 24, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 8, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2019PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 5, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 12, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance