USPTO serial 86932037
FORGED STRENGTH AT THE SPEED OF INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORGED STRENGTH AT THE SPEED OF INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Park
Andrew J. Park DENTONS US LLP1900 K STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys; Common metals and their alloys for further manufacturing; Castings of common metals and their alloys, namely, castings of titanium based metals and its alloys using plasma arc deposition technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Casting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Titanium parts made from plasma arc deposition processes, namely, structural parts for aircrafts, automotive vehicles, marine vessels | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Additive manufacturing of titanium metal parts using plasma arc deposition processes for use in aircraft; Material treatment in the nature of titanium and titanium alloys by plasma arc deposition processes; Treatment of materials in the nature of metals and metal ores by plasma arc additive-layer manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Norsk Titanium AS
- Other trademarks owned by Norsk Titanium AS
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named FORGED STRENGTH AT THE SPEED OF INNOVATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |