Drawing for FOVIONIX

USPTO serial 86933021

FOVIONIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOVIONIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Foley

JAMES R. FOLEY CLARK HILL PLC150 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote sensing technology, namely, computer software for monitoring an occupant of a land, sea or air vehicle or machine; Encoded electronic chip cards for monitoring an occupant of a land, sea or air vehicle or machine; Monitoring devices, namely, electronic systems for monitoring an occupant of a land, sea or air vehicle or machine; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, an on-board vehicular surveillance system comprised of cameras and monitors for exposing and eliminating the blind spots on both sides of the vehicle; Vehicle detection equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, image sensors, video cameras, and operating system and application software to detect vehicle locationACTIVE—
035Collection and compilation of information into computer databases in the field of driver assistance systemsACTIVE—
042Design and development of on-line driver assistance computer software systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance