Drawing for LINK4FUN

USPTO serial 86933146

LINK4FUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINK4FUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD., SUITE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing a website featuring information in the fields of education for children; providing on-line non-downloadable interactive children's electronic books and children's booklets on a variety of educational disciplines in the pre-school to eighth grade field; and providing on-line computer games for childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance