Drawing for EPICURIOUS

USPTO serial 86933860

EPICURIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPICURIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric E. Gisolfi

ERIC E. GISOLFI SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD, LLPONE WORLD TRADE CENTERNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Condiments, namely, ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, relish, horseradish, salsa and salad dressing; sauces, namely, hot sauce, barbecue sauce, soy sauce, Worcestershire sauce, steak sauce and tartar sauceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 13, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 5, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 11, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 11, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 11, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance