Drawing for STRUCTURAL EFFECTS

USPTO serial 86934165

STRUCTURAL EFFECTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYER, DAVID COREY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRUCTURAL EFFECTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen F. Roth

STEPHEN F. ROTH LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for processing digital music signals; downloadable software for processing digital music signalsACTIVE—
015Musical instruments; sound effect pedals for musical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 26, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 21, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance