USPTO serial 86935191
INSIGHT+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOY, JOSHUA SPENCER JOLL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSIGHT+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beverly A. Marsh
BEVERLY A MARSH STANDLEY LAW GROUP LLP6300 RIVERSIDE DRIVEDUBLIN, OH 43017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic booklets and charts containing flight information, namely, navigational, regulatory, and emergency information, all for the aviation industry; Computer software for use in the aviation industry, namely, for providing regulatory information and promoting regulatory compliance management; Computer software for the aviation industry, namely, software providing a regulatory database, graphical representations of regulatory requirements, and the ability to query, track, and manage regulatory obligations; Computer software for use in the aviation industry featuring scalable graph database functionality used to query, track, and manage regulatory obligations, as well as produce graphical representations of regulatory requirements | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing graph database software for regulatory compliance management in the field of aviation, for others; Developing graph database software for business process development and mapping in the field of aviation, for others; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software to assist others with regulatory compliance in the field of aviation, by providing a regulatory database, graphical representations of regulatory requirements, regulatory compliance mapping, and the ability to query, track, and manage regulatory obligations; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software to assist others with business process mapping, namely, business process mapping to address regulatory compliance and management, in the field of aviation; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring scalable graph database functionality used to query, track, and manage regulatory obligations, as well as produce graphical representations of regulatory requirements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |