Drawing for DUXBAK

USPTO serial 86935892

DUXBAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUXBAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine M. Hernandez

Christine M. Hernandez VF Intellectual Property Services, Inc.3411 Silverside Road200 Hanby BuildingWilmington, DE 19810

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing namely, pants, cruiser jackets for motorcyclists, chaps, bib overalls, belts, suspenders, shorts, socks, jacket liners, underwear; socks, gloves, headwear, namely, hoods, insulated hoods; and footwear, namely, shoes and bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 5, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 14, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Mar 22, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance