Drawing for GREEN HEAT

USPTO serial 86937935

GREEN HEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN HEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RENE-MARTIN OLIVERAS

18 BROOKLAKE ROADFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Environmentally friendly mold remediation services; Environmentally friendly mold prevention treatment of cloth; Environmentally friendly mold prevention treatment of clothing; Environmentally friendly mold prevention treatment of fabric; Environmentally friendly mold prevention treatment of furs; Environmentally friendly mold prevention treatment of textilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2018PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 9, 2018PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 9, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2017UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 18, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 18, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance