USPTO serial 86938892
DJX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DJX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marshall A. Lerner
MARSHALL A. LERNER KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP1875 CENTURY PARK EAST1150LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, short-sleeved and long-sleeved tops, bottoms, shirts, sports jerseys, sports bras, bralettes, tank tops with shelf bras, tops, shelf bras, shell tops, halter tops, tube tops, body suits, bandeau tops, off-the-shoulder tops, short-sleeved and long-sleeved T-shirts, tunics, pullovers, hooded tops, sweaters, cardigans, jackets, vests, coats, sweatshirts with or without zips, blouses, shorts, running shorts, compression shorts for athletic and non-medical purposes, trouser shorts, chino shorts, board shorts, capri trousers, cropped trousers, leggings, sweatpants, trousers, pants, skirts, skorts, jump suits, unitards, dresses, jumpers, underwear, lingerie, swimwear, swimsuits, beachwear, bathing suit cover-ups, singlets, tank tops, polo shirts, button down shirts, Henley tops, mock neck pullovers with or without zips, briefs, caps, hats, visors, baseball caps, golf hats, beanies, headbands, wristbands, scarves, ties, gloves, socks, belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |