Drawing for MATRIARCH

USPTO serial 86939244

MATRIARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATRIARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Borland

CHERYL L. BORLAND Griesing Law, LLC11 Garfield PlaceCincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Design of advertising materials for others and advertising services, all in the field of women's empowermentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 2, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance