Drawing for ECOLAND

USPTO serial 86942094

ECOLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAJA, AMER YASIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M. FURR Furr Law Firm2622 DeBolt RdUtica, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Seaweed extracts for food; Aloe vera prepared for human consumption; processed anchovy; Bacon; Milk beverages, milk predominating; Eggs; Peas, preserved; Fish, not live; Poultry, not live; Cream; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit jellies; Fruit pulp; Fruit salads; Sausages in batter; Fruit chips; Vegetable salads; Vegetable soup preparations; Lobsters, not live; Cocoa butter for food; Caviar; Kefir; Meat; Coconut fat; Coconut, desiccated; Coconut oil; Processed coconuts, namely, coconut butter for food; Crayfish, not live; Marmalade; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Olive oil for food; Cheese; Sausages; Shrimps, not live; Prawns, not live; Ham; Butter; Pork; Game, not live; Yoghurt; Prepared coconutsACTIVE—
030Honey; buttercream for filling for cakesACTIVE—
031Berries, fresh fruits; Beans, fresh; Fruit, fresh; Olives, fresh; Vegetables, fresh; Fresh Coconuts; unprocessed anchovyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance