Drawing for MADEWELL

USPTO serial 86942426

MADEWELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADEWELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel Karni Schmidt

JOEL KARNI SCHMIDT Cowan Liebowitz & Latman P C114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036ISSUING OF CREDIT CARDS; CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 1, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 24, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 17, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 17, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 19, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance