USPTO serial 86943179
THE STAND EST 2003 ALWAYS THE FINEST AMERICAN CLASSICS REDEFINED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2017
- Examiner
- ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE STAND EST 2003 ALWAYS THE FINEST AMERICAN CLASSICS REDEFINED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Encino, CA, US
Encino, CA, US
Encino, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary S. Phillips
Gary S. Phillips LAW OFFICE OF GARY S. PHILLIPS9401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 640BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Stand, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Stand, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Stand, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE STAND EST 2003 ALWAYS THE FINEST AMERICAN CLASSICS REDEFINED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |