Drawing for DEEP

USPTO serial 86943546

DEEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HEATHER M DENT, JUNGJIN LEE

HEATHER M DENT, JUNGJIN LEE Trademark Lawyer Law Firm, PLLCP.O. Box 512ANN ARBOR, MI 48106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridgesACTIVEJan 2, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 4, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 4, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 25, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 23, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance