USPTO serial 86943606
PLAYRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lausanne, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher E. Gatewood
CHRISTOPHER E. GATEWOOD THRESHOLD COUNSEL, PC1905 HUGUENOT ROAD, SUITE 200RICHMOND, VA 23235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Calibration; computer firmware design; computer programming; computer rental; computer software consultancy; computer software design; computer system analysis; computer system design; computer virus protection services; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating and maintaining web sites for others; data conversion of computer programs and data; design and development of navigation systems; design and development of navigation systems and route planning software; duplication of computer programs; graphic arts design; hosting web sites on the Internet; industrial design; information technology consultancy; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; material testing; meteorological information; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; providing search engines for the internet; quality control for others; recovery of computer data; rental of computer software; research and development of new products for others; scientific laboratory services; scientific research; server hosting; technical testing services and development of testing methods and programs in automotive field; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automotive applications; computer network configuration services and server hosting or administration; surveying; technical project studies in the field of car use; technical research in the field of optics, holography, electronics, computer science; testing, analysis and monitoring of navigation signals; testing of technical equipment car navigation systems, car entertainment systems, OBD dongles; updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |