Drawing for A

USPTO serial 86944080

A

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Anthony Figg

E. ANTHONY FIGG ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC607 14TH STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF A NON-DOWNLOADABLE WEB APPLICATION FOR SHARING WEB-BASED DOCUMENTS, TIME MANAGEMENT, SHARING RESTAURANT INFORMATION, SHARING REVIEWS FOR USE BY COMMERCIAL RETAILERS AND PUBLIC VENUES TO COMMUNICATE WITH THEIR END USERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 27, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance